![]() This comes after the iPhone gained home screen widgets with iOS 14 last year, but the iPad’s widgets are restricted to the sidebar only and can’t be interspersed with app icons. So far, rumors have indicated that iPadOS 15 will include dramatic changes to the iPad’s home screen for the first time. While their are certainly some video and photography use cases currently, it is possible that Apple tells more of the iPad Pro’s story at WWDC next month. The natural question now is how iPadOS can take advantage of the power in the M1 processor. In fact, leaker Jon Prosser has indicated those reviews will come on Wednesday, May 19. Apple’s new M1-powered iPad Pro 11 (2021) and 12.9 (2021) will come out in a couple of weeks, but the first Geekbench results are already out and they are quite impressive. With the first iPad Pro orders arriving to customers on May 21, we expect embargoed press reviews to be published sometime next week. It’s worth keeping in mind that, while these benchmark results are impressive, such results rarely tell the full story. It even outperforms the top-of-the-line 16-inch MacBook Pro, and is only bested by select configurations of the iMac and Mac Pro. So as you can see, the M1 iPad Pro’s performance is on par with M1-powered Macs, and significantly better than the A12Z iPad Pro it replaces. 16” MacBook Pro with Intel Core i9 processor: 6,819.Here are average multi-core results for other Apple products: For comparison’s sake, the 2020 iPad Pro, powered by an A12Z processor, achieves scores of 1,100 and 4,656 in single-core and multi-core benchmarking, respectively. Ahead of those arrivals, early benchmarks results from Apple’s newest tablet have hit Geekbench, and the results corroborate Apple’s claims that the new iPad Pro is up to 50% faster than its predecessors.Īs first spotted by MacRumors, early Geekbench 5 results show that the fifth-generation iPad Pro with the M1 processor achieves single-core scores of around 1,700 and multi-core scores of around 7,200. Geekbench 6 scores are calibrated against a baseline score of 2500 (which is the score of an Intel Core i7-12700). The data on this chart is gathered from user-submitted Geekbench 6 results from the Geekbench Browser. And this will put extra pressure on Intel and AMD.The first M1 iPad Pro orders are slated to arrive to customers later this month. Benchmark results for the iPad Pro (11-inch) can be found below. Samsung might also want to follow Apple’s footsteps, and Google is making its own ARM chips for Pixel devices. Microsoft is also interested in ARM-powered computers, and Qualcomm has been making its own desktop ARM SoC for years. It’s not just suitable for smartphones and tablets it can power traditional computers too. ![]() Apple is showing other chipmakers what a custom ARM processor can do. We already explained why the M1 is only the first phase of Intel’s ARM nightmare. The company did not alter the chips in any way, and the M1 powering the iPad Pro will deliver the same speed as the M1 in macOS laptops and desktops. These early Geekbench tests show that Apple wasn’t lying about the iPad Pro’s performance. Intel ran an aggressive campaign against the M1 MacBooks in recent months, a campaign that largely backfired, making Intel look bad rather than Apple’s brand new desktop-grade processors. ![]() That’s an older Intel chip, and Intel has just updated its mobile processors, but the comparison still stands. The M1 iPad Pro’s multi-core scores are similar to the M1 MacBook Air, and both of them outperform the Core i9 chip inside the 16-inch MacBook Pro (6,845).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |